Friday, January 30, 2009

Catching Wild Pigs...

An investment advisor - who shall remain nameless - came to see me last week. His take on the Global Financial Meltdown.
  • "It's basically over."
  • "Every country is coming up with new stimulus plans and bailouts."
  • "These bailouts will resolve all issues and turn the market."
  • "This is an excellent opportunity to catch the market at its bottom."
When he talked about how the bailouts will make everything better, I found myself remembering a story about catching wild pigs ....

You catch wild pigs by finding a suitable place in the woods and putting corn on the ground. The pigs find it and begin to come every day to eat the free corn. When they are used to coming every day, you put a fence down on one side of the place where they are used to coming. When they get used to the fence, they begin to eat the corn again and you put up another side of the fence. They get used to that and start to eat again. You continue until you have all four sides of the fence up with a gate in the last side. The pigs, who are used to the free corn, start to come through the gate to eat, you slam the gate on them and catch the whole herd.

Suddenly the wild pigs have lost their freedom. They run around and around inside the fence, but they are caught. Soon they go back to eating the free corn. They are so used to it that they have forgotten how to forage in the woods for themselves, so they accept their captivity.

That is exactly what is happening all over the world and especially in the western economies. The governments keep pushing its citizens toward socialism and keeps spreading the free corn out in the form of new stimulus programs and bailouts. While we continually lose our freedoms -- just a little at a time.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

A rumor.....

I have an account with Citibank, that I have in the past used to buy mutual funds park some cash etc. From time to time their "Relationship Manager" will come calling and try and sell me some more mutual funds.

On his latest visit he mentioned an interesting tid-bit. The banks are all buying the long-end of the T-Bill (India Gilt) and not the short-end. I thought that was interesting because its contrary to what the banks are "expected" to be doing.

One of the easiest ways for Banks to earn money is to play the spread i.e. acquire funds at the short-end and lend out funds at the long-end. Thus their goal is to have a steep yield curve - with an upward slope, anything else and they make less profits than they normally would.

By buying the long-end they are increasing the price of the bond (higher demand) and depressing the yield, this flattens the yield curve and reduces the profits banks would make by playing the spread.

So why are they doing it? Are they expecting Deflation in the future and hence lower interest rates, and in so doing locking in the current "relatively" high yields.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Britain is bankrupt



That's a monthly chart of the British Pound (GBP) against the US$. Notice the Waterfall-like fall from 200 to 140. It's currently at pretty strong support going back to the lows in 2001 and 1993. I expect this support to hold .. for now. When this support breaks, and it SHALL, its goodbye and goodnight.

The British government has taken on the liabilities of its banking system. RBS alone has liabilities of £1.8 trillion, three times the annual government spending, against assets of £1.9 trillion. While RBS is notionally solvent, the true value of its assets is considerably worse.

Meanwhile National Debt is approximately 630 Billion GBP and GDP is approximately £1.4 trillion. The total Debt load is thus conservatively 100% of its GDP. Niall Ferguson in his excellent book "Empire" showed that the UK has in the past consistently carried and serviced Crown Debts between 2-3 times its GDP. Unfortunately in those days, Great Britain was the world's paramount superpower and the Sterling was the reserve currency of the world.

In attempting to fight deflation and unleash a storm of liquidity the BoE governor Mervyn King has said "Despite those big cuts, there remains a risk that inflation will fall below 2 percent," ..... "It is sensible for the Monetary Policy Committee to prepare for the possibility -- and I stress that we are not there yet -- that it may need to move beyond the conventional instrument". Translation: Rate Cuts are doing F%$@-all to solve the crisis, we must start monetizing government paper.

I had thought Russia would be first major economy to default, it looks like I was wrong. That honour might be bestowed upon M/S King and Brown. Welcome to Reykjavik on the Thames.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

I changed my mind

After having studied the S&P chart in more detail and looked at the damage to the XLF, I have decided to dump my long Big Caps, long Nasdaq 100, long Oil & Gas and long Semi positions at the open. I am opening a new short position on Small Caps. I will be keeping my long Agriculture and long Crude.

I fully expect to buy them back cheaper, possibly later today. I will probably close the short small caps position later today.

I got creamed

OK I admit it.. I got creamed by the market today. All the broad indexes fell by about 5%+ today. The S&P is now at 805. My invested capital fell by about 10% and my total capital by about 6%. I have four choices now:

1: Close out all long positions and move to cash.
2: Close out all long positions and go short.
3: Open a new short position for a hedge and if we go lower from here dump my longs and increase the hedge, if we go higher and break 820-ish on the S&P on volume then remove the short hedge.
4: Do nothing, wait and see what today (the 21st) brings.

Here's what I think is happening. We are in the middle of a Presidential rally - that will probably peter out at 950-ish. I was expecting 1050 last week, but after today's decline I don't see the market breaking the high of January 6th.

The problem is where is the bottom of the current move downward. If it's here or 790-ish, it makes sense to sweat it out. On the other hand it could very well be around 740-ish. In which case I should go with 1 or 2.

I am long from 850 and I could bear a drawdown to 790 - but anything more would be stupid. So here's what I am going to do if we break today on volume I will dump all my longs and be on cash.

So for today it's #4.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

The more things change...

The more they remain the same. On my way to work, the local radio had interrupted its program of non-stop Bollywood music (of the kiss me- kiss me fare) to talk about Barack Obama's inauguration.

As the 44th president of the US, his story, eloquence and the fact that we are a relatively pro-American country has caught the attention of the ordinary Indian. The expectation seems to be that he is the messiah come to deliver America and the world from:
1: Financial Meltdown
2: Terrorism
3: Over-reliance on Petroleum
4: Environmental Degradation

Being the messiah may just be too heavy a cross for one man to bear. But even if he were Jesus/Buddha/Gandhi/ML King/FDR/Abe Lincoln re-incarnated, the simple truth is that human nature NEVER changes. The same mistakes that we committed in the 1930s we are condemned to commit again.

The roaring 20s brought about a generation of people used to easy money and booming markets. They learnt their mistakes, suffered pain and put in place a host of regulations and safety nets. But once that generation passed away society has gone about making the same mistakes again.

Just like the 20s we have created another easy money bubble and re-priced risky assets. And just like the 20s this bubble will have the same outcome - for the simple fact that human nature is STILL the same.

We will go through the same deflationary spiral that we did in the thirties. And this deflationary spiral will be followed by hyperinflation as the establishment desperately tries to control the force of nature by printing money. This hyperinflation will create a class of people who will be wiped out. With nothing left to lose this class will take upon themselves to unseat the existing powers and put in place a new system of governance. This might be Fascism or Socialism reincarnated, or it might be some other -ism. Regardless the world will be a different place once the trough of this cycle is reached.

To think that one man, even if he is the most powerful man on this planet, can stop human nature from running it's course is wishful thinking of the first order.

Monday, January 19, 2009

Stocks Update

On Friday (16/1) I closed out all my short positions and went long. I expect the current rally in the S&P to top out around 980-1000 ish. At which point I will go short in force.

I am currently in the following positions:

1: Long Crude
2: Long Oil and Energy Index
3: Long Nasdaq 100
4: Long Big Caps (A proxy for the Dow 30)
5: Long Semi-Conductors, the SOX index
6: Long Agriculture Index
7: 40% Cash

For the record the short-gold stock was a loss, the short financials, short real estate and short small caps were all profitable.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

The rise and continued rise of the dollar

I am watching the US$ like a hawk




Notice the US$ reach the 50-day MA. If it breaks that its very bullish for the $ and bad for commodities and stocks. For the record I am short Gold and short stocks. On a longer term basis it just closed above its 200-week MA. See the Weekly chart.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

2009 For you

This seems to be the season for 2009 predictions, so for the first time I decided to put mine out there.

I'll start with the Economics first.

1: S&P500 will print a 5-handle this year. After a spring rally, the downtrend should resume in earnest in the summer.
2: SENSEX will touch 4000, the timing should be similar to the S&P's low.
3: This year people will stop talking about recession and downturn. They'll start talking about a depression instead.
4: US unemployment (official) figures will touch 10%.
5: There will be a currency crisis, but unlike most people I do not think the US$ will collapse (at least not this year). I think the currency crisis will be in Euroland or with the GBP.
6: India's IT industry will end 2009 in a much worse state than 2008. I fully expect the top 10 companies to layoff 50% of their staff.
7: Foreclosure and Repossession will make their appearance in general desi vocabulary.

Domestic (India) Politics.

1: No national party will win a clear majority. There will be a coalition government (and I'll hedge my bets here) probably led by the Congress and supported by a host of ne'er-do-wells.
2: Mayawati will NOT be the next Prime Minister. But she could very well be in the Union Cabinet.
3: Rahul Gandhi will NOT be the next Prime Minister. I suspect he will not have a very public role in the next government either.
4: Amar Singh and Mulayam will be marginalized by the congress in favor of Mayawati.
5: NCP will fare badly in Maharashtra. There will be a 3 way-split between the NCP, Congress and BJP-SS in Maharashtra. MNS will make its way to Parliament.

US Politics

1: Obama will lose his way and from the great "black" hope he will become one of many who over-promised and under-delivered.
2: There will be an undercurrent of rising resentment against the government. While nothing will be overt but 2010 might be the year that the American system of government changed to something else.

International Affairs

1: Pakistan will collapse, the mullahs supported by the Army will take over the government. Pakistani society will enter the dark ages.
2: Iraq will be peaceful, Palestine will not be.
3: The Indian Army will be overtly deployed in Afghanistan. First as advisors and then slowly to replace the NATO and US forces who will withdraw by year-end.
4: 2009 will NOT see an overt conflict between nation-states in South Asia, but 2010 will be another matter.

I'll come back same time, next year and see how I did.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Current Stock Positions

These are my current open positions

1: Short Gold - Rationale I am expecting Gold to fall to 790-800 is per ounce as the USD starts rising. Expected timeframe 2-3 months.

2: Short Real Estate, Short Financials, Short Russell 2000 - these are my chosen vehicles for the short-side plays of 2009. I expect the bear rally to take a hiatus till next week 19/1/2009 - ish. The S&P should retrace to 820-830ish. I will then close these short positions and go long.

3: Cash - approx: 20% of portfolio.

SAY you SAY ME - The Auditors

The SAY (Satyam) saga just keeps getting better and better. The CFO claims that the inflated cash balances were handled directly by Raju and he was told to keep his nose out of the business. In the meantime there have been calls for PwC's hide.

PwC of course is the hapless group of auditors who audited Bernie Madoff's feed fund the Fairfield Greenwich Group and now have this sordid tale to add to their list of accomplishments. However I "think" (with an emphasis on the word think) that PwC may not be complicit in this particular case. Here is what I think happened.

1: Raju pledges his SAY shares for a margin loan.
2: Raju takes the margin money and pumps it back into SAY's accounts. Thus the bank balances now show inflated amounts.
3: Raju inflates the Revenue numbers which tie in with actual cash in the bank.
4: The bank's provide valid statements showing cash balances.
5: PwC certifies the cash/bank balances.
6: Raju then siphons off the bank balances and uses it for his nefarious purposes.
7: Raju proceeds to repeat steps 1 through 6 every quarter, each time pledging more and more of his shares. Until
A: He runs out of shares to pledge.
B: Is unable to raise cash any other way, and with quarter-ending coming up is desperate to show that he has money in the bank.
C: He comes up with an ingenious idea, utilize the cash (he is supposed to have) to buy other assets. Since he happens to be the seller he has no problem being paid in fictional cash. The auditor now receives a bank statement showing reduced balances and certifies the same. The cash flow statement shows an outgo due to a financing activity and all is well.
D: Scheme C - collapses and the rest is history.

Saturday, November 29, 2008

The nature of evil

Why must darkness obscure light? Why must evil triumph over good? Why must our prayers remain unanswered? Why is good mistaken for weakness? Why is friendship taken advantage of?

Why must a 2 year old be an orphan? Why must a family be charred to death? Why must a husband not know where his wife is? Why must he be afraid to face his children?

These are heavy unbearable questions. No matter how steely one's resolve and how unbroken one's spirit is, one must ask: why is life so unfair?

Saturday, September 20, 2008

Capitalists of the world unite.. you have nothing (else) to lose

http://pensionpulse.blogspot.com/2008/09/capitalists-of-world-unite.html

Thursday, September 18, 2008

ZIRP....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/09/18/ccambrose118.xml

Read the headline (and tagline) a couple of times. For the US Treasury Bill to go to Zero that basically means that the demand for US Govt Debt is so high that the US does not have to pay any interest to the investor.

Now look at it this way for the investor to refuse interest it basically means he does not care about Return "on" Investment, in fact the only thing he is concerned about now is Return "of" Investment. So if he thinks that the only safe place that guarantees return of principal is US Govt Debt - then this implies that all other categories of debt is unsafe. This includes the debt of other countries and the debt of large corporations. At the extreme even a company like Shell will thus not be able to finance it's debt.

So what happens when Shell can't re-finance its debt? It has a liquidity crisis. OK so it generates liquidity by liquidating its illiquid assets i.e. property, oil rigs, plant and machinery, exploration rights etc. Now think of it on a global scale what if other corporations also face the same crisis - and all of them at the same time must sell their illiquid assets. There will be a buyer's strike. A global asset deflation of the scale that we have never witnessed before.

Corporations that have the most illiquid balance sheets and have the most amount of leverage will be the first to collapse as things turn bad the deflationary fire will reach up to the more stable, better capitalized corporation.

Some questions....

Why is gold "more" protected than other investments, like real estate?

The answer to this is a little complicated and long-winded, you may have to read this a couple of times to "get it". But first we need to go through some basic definitions. Some of these definitions may seem counter-intuitive and contrary to what is generally accepted but as you will see these are the true definitions of these terms.

Inflation: When we think of inflation we think of an increase in the price of good of services. That's not really true, the rise in the general price level of goods and services (most commonly measured through a Consumer Price Index - CPI) is an after-effect of inflation. Inflation is really an increase in the supply of money and credit. Because there is an increase in the supply of money (and credit) there is too much money chasing (relatively) fewer goods, thus the prices of goods as measured by money (the supply of which has increased) rises.

Deflation: The exact inverse of inflation is deflation; when the supply of money and credit contracts then that is called deflation. Because there is a decrease in the supply of money (and credit) there is less money chasing (relatively) more goods, thus the prices of goods as measured by money (the supply of which has decreased) falls.

An important thing to realize is that an increase in the prices of goods and services is the result of past inflations. Consequently when there is deflation it will result in future decreases in the prices of goods and services.

During periods of rising prices and (especially during severe or "hyper"- increases) you do not want to hold cash or cash equivalents. This is because with time can buy less and less of the goods and services you need. Consequently the value of money as measured by the amount of goods and services that can be purchased per unit of said money keeps decreasing. So what do you hold instead? You want to hold assets that can preserve or store value in the face of a general rise in prices. Real Estate, commodities such as Metals, Coal, Crude and Precious Metals i.e. Gold, Silver are such assets - these assets are also called "hard" assets. In fact in extreme increases of prices you want to hold as much debt as possible and use the debt to finance the purchase of these "hard" assets. This is because the rate of interest that you pay on your debt will almost always lag the increase in the value of the asset. Think of it this way: there are two graphs both rising, but the slope of the interest rate is less than the slope of the price increase. As a result Property - which you can easily finance - is a very good asset class to invest during periods of increasing price levels.

So if deflation is the exact inverse of inflation - then during periods of decreases in price levels you want to invest in assets that have the opposite characteristics of "hard" assets and you want to stay away from debt. In fact the only asset class that does well during decreases in price levels is money.

Gold is a very funny asset and has some important characteristics that make it special and different from everything else (including other precious metals such as Ag, Pt etc.)

1. All the Gold ever mined in human history approximately 150,000 - 160,000 tons is still with us.

2. The supply of Gold is very stable and is around 2% of the total Gold supply. It takes around 9-10 years for a new Gold mine to come online and then a further 5-7 years for production to hit the market. Thus from exploration to sale Gold takes about 14-17 years. By which time current Gold mines will be in decline. Thus this supply is not very likely to change over time. In fact in recorded human history there has been only one time in which the supply of Gold has increased dramatically, that's when Spain took the Gold of the Mayas and Aztecs in the 1600s and flooded Europe with it. Thus if Gold were to be used as money it would be relatively free from increases in supply i.e. Inflation.

3. Gold has very little industrial usage - its major use is as jewelery. As you are probably aware in India people often buy and gift jewelry not just for consumption but also as security and to use as money when in need. In fact this is true the world over.

4. Gold is almost indestructible (If I remember right you need Aqua Regia to dissolve Gold), relatively portable.

Because of these reasons Gold has and will continue to be regarded as money. In fact in the Foreign Exchange markets Gold trades like any other currency.

So in a deflationary scenario Gold should do well. I expect the world's industrial economies to fall into a deflationary depression thus the only asset class that will do well is money and it's equivalent - Gold falls in that category.

Why do you say that this worldwide depression is impossible to reverse? Haven't we faced crises of more severe magnitude before, and, come out of it before? Why is this depression more severe than (say) the Great Depression of 1929, starting with the crash of US stock market on the infamous "Black Tuesday"?

I'm not saying this is the end of mankind as we know it. We will get through this, it just so happens that we will fall into a deflationary depression and then with time (5 years, 10 years who knows how long...) we will come out of it. It will be more severe than 1929 (which by the way was exactly the same thing) simply because the magnitude of the deflation is much larger. If you think of it as a wave, the amplitude of the wave is greater by several degrees of magnitude consequently the effects of the wave will be that much more severe.

You say that "cash and cash equivalents" are the best bets to invest in - in that case, why is US dollar is better mode of saving than, say, Euro or Yen? Isn't this meltdown expected to affect all industrial markets?

The Dollar is the best of a worse lot. The Euro has political issues. No currency without the backing of a stable nation state survives for very long. The European Monetary Union is a grand experiment that will unfortunately fail if it is not accompanied by a political union. Japan's economy is in terminal decline because of demographic issues unless they start allowing massive immigration their economy will slowly reduce to insignificance.

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

AIG bailout doesn't change a thing

I think they should just merge with LIC.. :-)

Seriously its a $85B loan at 850 bps over Libor - which is around 2.9%? - so that's 11.4%. The Interest expense alone is $2.4B per quarter. The last 3 quarters their loss was $14B the only quarter they made money - they made about $3B. But lets say by some miracle they manage to make the interest payment.

Their B/S equity is 78B - so not only are they wiping that out they are effectively making the firm insolvent. I just don't see how this preserves the firm's credit rating, which was the original intent no? Admittedly the equity is book value but in this situation I don't expect a buyer to pay a whole lot more than book.

Which brings me back to my original point.. This doesn't change anything but it does give AIG's counterparties time to unwind their position, and maybe that's all that the Fed wants at this point. But you have to wonder that if it takes $85B (there's no way in hell that the loan is going to be repaid fully) to buy time, what sort of dis-orderly liquidation were we looking at?

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Mutually Assured Destruction

We are faced with the total and complete annihilation of modern capitalism as we know it. With Lehman bankrupt and hence it's debt gone to junk status, AIG facing ratings downgrades and WaMu down to junk, here's whats going to happen as the dominoes fall one by one:

1. Lets say that I am financial institution. My balance sheet is probably a couple of hundred billion dollars, but the equity position (i.e. assets less liabilities) is quite possibly in the tens of billions of dollars i.e. at the minimum a 10 to 1 leverage. Lets assume that I have been conservative with my investments and most of my Assets are AAA (the highest investment grade) rated. So I don't have to carry that much Cash because the value of these investments should cover my liabilities.

2. Therefore as and when these investments receive a ratings downgrade I must increase the level of cash that I carry, so that I can cover the loss in value of the erstwhile AAA investments. If I can't raise cash then my own ratings get downgraded.

3. That in itself is not so bad except....everything and everyone else (i.e. other financial institutions) is leveraged and at equilibrium. So if I can't raise cash not only do I get downgraded but anyone else holding investments issued by me is affected and they have to raise capital to cover the loss in values of paper that I have issued or contend with having their rating lowered.

4. Well that's still not fatal in itself .... except much of the investments that I have made and others have made based on paper I have issued are made up of derivatives which are not regulated and are of indeterminate value. Or to be precise whose value can be determined only by a bunch of PhD(s) and a gaggle of lawyers.

5. Now all these investments are interconnected and held by State funds, mutual funds, world funds , sovereign funds and god knows what else then the entire world's markets melt down together because no one knows what the true values of any investment are and therefore no one can be trusted to make good on any liability.

Default thus turns to liquidation... KABOOM!

For the record I am short the US Financial Sector, Short Crude and Natgas, Short Small Cap and Short Basic Materials.

Friday, September 12, 2008

Senators Ask Fannie, Freddie to Freeze Foreclosures

Bloomberg says:

U.S. Senate Banking Committee members urged Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage companies placed under federal control this week, to freeze foreclosures on loans in their portfolios for at least 90 days.

There's another quote:

"This action would provide immediate relief to many homeowners'' and let the companies "turn these non-performing loans into performing assets to minimize losses,'' Senators Charles Schumer, Robert Menendez and other panel Democrats said today in a letter to the companies and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which is overseeing them under the government conservatorship.

Umm.. No. If not collecting the EMI on a loan makes the loan into a "performing asset and minimizes losses" we would have to rewrite the history of banking, in fact while we're at it why don't you change the definition of all loans and just start calling it gifts - because thats what these supreme intellects propose.

I guess politicians all over the world are the same, and here was I thinking that only our Desi politicians had a monopoly on economic illiteracy.

Never Forget...

Here's to you Jeremy, this last pepperoni slice is for you.

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

So much for Gustav

Well so much for Gustav - turned out to be quite literally a tempest in a teacup. Looks like my bet on NATGAS turned out wrong and NATGAS, Crude and Gold all collapsed through early trading on Tuesday AM. Crude is at $110, NATGAS at $7.50 and Gold at $819.
I am currently down about 7% from my position and am seriously considering throwing in the towel. It looks demand destruction is going to trump all other themes. I full expect Crude to go down to $75.